[TYPO3-core] Official information about the upcoming LTS version
Jigal van Hemert
jigal.van.hemert at typo3.org
Thu Sep 20 14:46:27 CEST 2012
Hi,
On 20-9-2012 14:06, Tolleiv Nietsch wrote:
> Anyway (to go a little offtopic) - what I still dislike is that the 6.2
> LTS version could be followed by a 6.3 version. Imho this version
> shouldn't be named "6.2" but "6.5" to have a strong relation to the old
> LTS and it should ideally be followed by "7.0".
>
> In addition as already pointed out, I really dislike that the 6month
> release cycle topic is questioned again and again.
The six month release cycle is a good compromise and works well for me.
I personally think the actual version number should be determined around
feature freeze based on the features which made it in time, the impact, etc.
Furthermore I'm still not convinced that we should have a LTS version at
all. The only reason so far is that clients like it because they don't
have to pay for major upgrades for a long time (a.k.a. stability).
If such an LTS version is a wish of the Association members then it
might be option that they hire someone to maintain it after the normal
support period. If this is a task for the paid coder which is in the
budget for next year then that coder could simply take care of all the
backports of bugfixes and bug reports for that LTS version. This will
give a bit more room for the core team.
--
Jigal van Hemert
TYPO3 Core Team member
TYPO3 .... inspiring people to share!
Get involved: typo3.org
More information about the TYPO3-team-core
mailing list