[TYPO3-core] RFC: Advanced BE search form

[Sebastian Kurfuerst]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Michael,
>> * it would be nice if "Advanced query" was the default when "full
>>  search" is selected. I know this breaks BW "compatibility" up to
>>  a certain extent, but it is a new feature which should be
>> "promoted".
> Can still be changed, but I didn't do that yet. Personally I think
> that the quick search is easier for short lookups, therefore I'm
> fine with the way it works currently.
What do you think of adding a short note to the normal search "If more
advanced queries are needed, please use the ....."?
I fear that the new functionality won't be used which would be a pity.

>> * for the checkbox where the current field can be negated, it
>> would be nice to add some caption there (does the "title" tag
>> work there?) to describe that it negates everything. It was a bit
>> unclear to me at first.
> Joey did it, but I removed it during my cleanup of that patch.
> Sorry dude! Will add it again when the patch is in CVS.
great! maybe use as title "NOT" - but just an idea.
> Has been fixed. ....
good work!

I have some more comments:

    * There is an issue with versioning/workspaces. For example, if
      you have a page versioned, all versions of the page appear. It
      would be nice to have a checkbox which adds "AND pid != -1" to
      the page which is enabled by default. I think in normal mode it
      makes sense to hide versioned records.
    * The two "undelete" icons are missing - make sure you have them
    * The icons right to each query part -  where you can delete it,
      refresh etc. comes always directly after the input fields. It
      would be nice to have some border of maybe 5px before it, and
      have it aligned on the right side in every case.
    * The label for the icon to collapse a level has the title
      "collapse level" - I think it would be nice to have "delete
      sublevels" instead. When it is called "collapse", I expect a
      non-destructive action.

So - it works really fluently already, these are just minor changes I
think. Great work :-)

I am looking forward to see it in the final release!

Greets, Sebastian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFD7IDtygDVWNTabbkRAj3EAJ0SFqb6L0gScB0aStLLr/8LE27kngCdHAju
oI17oHqAbappdC2g1rFQg6w=
=cxu0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----