[TYPO3-templavoila] templavoila framework - TS inclusion

[G.Unger]

and, sorry I forgot, same is with the skin_tsconfig.ts
I do not see that one included anywhere :(

rgds,
GUIDO


On 2010-04-06 21:29:04 +0200, G.Unger <skyfreak1 at gmx.net> said:

> hello ron
> hello WEC-team
> 
> I love the TV framework ext, actually I use a simple yet much 
> 'rookie-like' approche to this with nested FCEs ... not as an inch as 
> much comfy and elaborated as yr extension.
> 
> I do have a question though please.
> following the development of the framework for a couple of weeks now (I 
> tested whatever ya put online) I am very happy to see the framework as 
> an extension of it's own now.
> 
> I managed to setup a 'custom-quicksite' to fit my needs and might 
> kickoff the next project with that setup. only the inclusion of the 
> skin_constants.ts and the skin_typoscript.ts are making me wonder. they 
> are included twice as I notice in the BE-template-analyzer.
> 
> this resides due to the lines 239-282 in class.tx_templavoilaframework_lib.php
> 
> first constants and typoscript are included from skin, then the ones 
> from core of ext and the again only the constants from skin.
> 
> my question arises from the following simple demand:
> in core_typoscript.ts on line 2755 there is the browser title:
> page.headerData.1.2.noTrimWrap = = | &#124; {$siteTitle} |
> 
> what if I want:
> page.headerData.1.2.noTrimWrap = = | <something else here> {$siteTitle} |
> 
> ok I thought, put
> page.headerData.1.2.noTrimWrap = = | <something else here> {$siteTitle} |
> into the skin_typoscript.ts to overwrite the core value inorder not to 
> touch the core for update issues.
> 
> but apparently due to TS inclusion as mentioned above in 
> BE-template-analyzer my value is first set and then overwritten by core 
> and the again only the constants are included.
> 
> anything wrong the way I interpret/read your workflow?
> I was convinced the way I read through the extension and .ts filese, 
> taht my custom skin in the end has the last 'bite'.
> 
> rgds and congrats again for a great extension!
> GUIDO