[TYPO3-templavoila] TemplaVoila v/s Traditional Templating (Template AutoParser, TypoScript etc.)

Tapio Markula tapio.markula at atwebteam.com
Sat Dec 2 21:52:43 CET 2006

Dmitry Dulepov kirjoitti:
> Hi!
> shikeb wrote:
>> Thanks, Dmitry and Gideon, for your kind words. I wanted to know 
>> whether   flexible content elements can be emulated the traditional 
>> way. What I mean is that flexible content defines a template for 
>> individual elements quite easily which we can later on plug into our 
>> page templates anywhere where we are allowed to insert content, just 
>> like regular content elements. If I were using markers and all would 
>> that be possible? I am just a bit naive in visualizing this so I 
>> thought to ask the noble guys of the lists. I have read the mtb's (a 
>> long time back) and the ftb documents but I'll re-read them following 
>> Dimitry's advice.
> I do not think you can emulate sections (repeatable) using MTB.

kb_nescefe - the version, which I used had a bug in fronted file
(missing termination (}) from a function.
support nested contented elements.
That's simple to use and very userfriendly for end users - IMO simpler 
for endusers than flexible content elements of TemplaVoila.

More information about the TYPO3-project-templavoila mailing list