[TYPO3-performance] No results with eaccelerator
oliver at liquidlight.co.uk
Mon Nov 2 09:20:10 CET 2009
Same experience here: eAccelerator was faster than XCache in our
benchmarks, though not by a huge amount.
We switched to XCache when Debian lenny was released as it was far more
convenient than re-compiling eAccelerator from source every time the
Debian team releases a new PHP security patch ;)
Christian Kuhn wrote:
> Oliver Rowlands wrote:
>> This is the eAccelerator configuration that we used to use on most of
>> our production environments before switching to XCache:
> Do you get better results with XCache than with eaccelerator? From my
> experience eaccelerator is still about 10% quicker than XCache (compared
> XCache 1.2.2 debian package, with eaccelerator 0.9.5.3 from source).
> One reason of this might be, that eaccelerator comes with an opcode
> cache (like XCache) _and_ with some magic optimizer code foo (which is
> is not implemented in XCache in 1.2.2, it just returns 0!).
> Warning: Don't use eaccelerator 0.9.6-rc1, the author dropped the
> optimizer to make this version compatible with php 5.3. He doesn't seem
> to be able to maintain the optimizer codebase any longer. But 9.5.3 is
> stable for debian lenny 5.2 packages for me and is quicker than XCache.
More information about the TYPO3-performance