[Typo3-marketing] Logfile analysis of TYPO3.com

[Jan-Hendrik Heuing [NF]]

"Juergen Egeling" <egeling at punkt.de> schrieb im Newsbeitrag 
news:mailman.1160.1105353057.6213.typo3-marketing at lists.netfielders.de...
>* Jan-Hendrik Heuing [NF] <jh at netfielders.de> [050110 09:34]:
>> Soon we'll add a web bug for urchin, which is a great tool I think. Best 
>> I
>> have seen until now. That would solve those problems for the future 
>> anyway.
>> www,.urchin.com (Version 5)
> I don't see this solving the problems
> 1.) You get somehow incorrect data
> a.) people deny cookies that are longer kept than for the session
> b.) People do not have javascript enabled in companies.

Wrong. Webbug is included as an image (or javascript). That turns out like 
standard access to a webpage, while this webbug is not even cached if I 
remember right.
This would give you much better accuracy!
Just in case you don't know:
http://www.urchin.com/products/v5/modules_urchin_5_base.html
If that's not enough, I could try to find the link for the web bug.
I might be wrong with this, but I do not know of any more detailed and 
accuarat (through the webbug) report. It can also analyse apache logs if 
anything else fails...

German demo including the webbug:
http://demo.urchin.com/report.cgi?profile=http://demo.urchin.com/report.cgi?profile=www.hollywoodweb.com-Dynamic&user=german

In about 1-2 weeks, we'll fix those details. Either we purchase a standard 
urchin 100 profile, or we get 300 profiles through another company. I'll 
keep you up to date.

> So in my opinion you lose accurat data.
> On another thing: What do we have to lose if we just use another tool
> as an addition?

Time ;) I do not see a reason to spend time on additional tools if this 
works out...
BTW: Testinstallation is running through all logfiles at the moment.

>
> Juergen