[TYPO3-dev] Fully Blown StdWrap - Check it out!

dan frost dan at danfrost.co.uk
Thu Mar 16 00:35:22 CET 2006


Sounded like obts... but...


>> what is the difference between this and objecttyposcript? ObTS?
> 
> I can't tell you exactly but these are some of the known differences at the
> moment:
> 
> 1. less code (about 30K only)
yes... but i think a lot of the obts overhead can
be removed now...
> 2. less complicated (no additional things like "_attributes")
>     You can do things like
> 
>       value = a value
>       wrap = left | {gpvar : right}
>       wrap.insertData = 1
> 
>     instead of
> 
>       value = a value
>       wrap = left | {gpvar : right}
>       _attributes.wrap = 1
>       wrap.insertdata = 1
> 
but you need to standadise at some point, based on
something.
> 3. camelCase still possible
it is in php5 - stupid php4 can only see php4 in
get-methods...

(y'know - i kinda think php is rubbish now!)

> 4. stdWrap only no additional functionality needed
could be plugged in with architecture of obts.
Same architecture, but minimal use so lower overheads.

> 5. no additional Datatypes yet, since I just wanted to improve stdWrap
as above

dan

P.s. perhaps don't do things by halves. Basically,
most TS config takes at least 5 to 10 times as
much time as a semi-good PHP coder would take to
code it from scratch. I think we should review our
priorities...



> 
> You might find more by checking out the extension code.
> 
> Joey
> 




More information about the TYPO3-dev mailing list