[TYPO3-dev] Fully Blown StdWrap - Check it out!
dan frost
dan at danfrost.co.uk
Thu Mar 16 00:35:22 CET 2006
Sounded like obts... but...
>> what is the difference between this and objecttyposcript? ObTS?
>
> I can't tell you exactly but these are some of the known differences at the
> moment:
>
> 1. less code (about 30K only)
yes... but i think a lot of the obts overhead can
be removed now...
> 2. less complicated (no additional things like "_attributes")
> You can do things like
>
> value = a value
> wrap = left | {gpvar : right}
> wrap.insertData = 1
>
> instead of
>
> value = a value
> wrap = left | {gpvar : right}
> _attributes.wrap = 1
> wrap.insertdata = 1
>
but you need to standadise at some point, based on
something.
> 3. camelCase still possible
it is in php5 - stupid php4 can only see php4 in
get-methods...
(y'know - i kinda think php is rubbish now!)
> 4. stdWrap only no additional functionality needed
could be plugged in with architecture of obts.
Same architecture, but minimal use so lower overheads.
> 5. no additional Datatypes yet, since I just wanted to improve stdWrap
as above
dan
P.s. perhaps don't do things by halves. Basically,
most TS config takes at least 5 to 10 times as
much time as a semi-good PHP coder would take to
code it from scratch. I think we should review our
priorities...
>
> You might find more by checking out the extension code.
>
> Joey
>
More information about the TYPO3-dev
mailing list