[TYPO3-dev] Fully Blown StdWrap - Check it out!

[JoH]

>> BTW: fullStdWrap = 1 is only necessary to keep backwards
>> compatibility. If you don't set it, the original stdWrap is used.
>> Maybe this could be a parameter for the install tool in the final
>> version.
>
> what is the difference between this and objecttyposcript? ObTS?

I can't tell you exactly but these are some of the known differences at the
moment:

1. less code (about 30K only)
2. less complicated (no additional things like "_attributes")
    You can do things like

      value = a value
      wrap = left | {gpvar : right}
      wrap.insertData = 1

    instead of

      value = a value
      wrap = left | {gpvar : right}
      _attributes.wrap = 1
      wrap.insertdata = 1

3. camelCase still possible
4. stdWrap only no additional functionality needed
5. no additional Datatypes yet, since I just wanted to improve stdWrap

You might find more by checking out the extension code.

Joey

-- 
Wenn man keine Ahnung hat: Einfach mal Fresse halten!
(If you have no clues: simply shut your knob sometimes!)
Dieter Nuhr, German comedian
openBC: http://www.cybercraft.de