[TYPO3-50-general] Discussion to CodingStandards

[Robert Lemke]

Hi Tim,

Am 14.01.2008 um 20:58 schrieb Tim Eilers:

> thanks, but you missed some and i have questions to some. i get  
> worried
> about discussing them here or there... here you can have a nicer  
> talk by
> quoting, so i'll do it here:
>
> 	"function doc comment -> "integer" or "int" or allow both?
> 	integer is already implemented in CodeSniffer itself, so
> 	that would be easier"
>
> what about it? simple question, simple answer... :)

"integer" only.

> ok. if you agree i'll do it like this:
>
> i'll make the checks to be not that stricts and only check tags for
> being there and have the right content, if it is possible to check:
> File:	@package	Package Name
> 	@subpacke	Subpackage Name
> Class:	@package	Package Name
> Method: @param		Type and Comment
> 	@return		Type (no comment check, because a
> 			comment to "void" makes no sense)
> Var:	@var		Type and Comment
>
> All other Tags will be ignored (incl. @author, why is described by  
> me in
> the wiki). The order will be ignored, too.
>
> OK?

Perfect.

Thanks!

robert