[TYPO3-50-general] Discussion to CodingStandards

Malte Jansen mail at maltejansen.de
Tue Jan 29 20:42:02 CET 2008


what about having variable-type HTML?
Representing a string with HTML-tags.
So you know, if a functions returns some HTML-syntax. It's pretty 
useful, if you know, wether a function returns HTML string or just plain 



Robert Lemke schrieb:
> Hi Tim,
> Am 14.01.2008 um 20:58 schrieb Tim Eilers:
>> thanks, but you missed some and i have questions to some. i get worried
>> about discussing them here or there... here you can have a nicer talk by
>> quoting, so i'll do it here:
>>     "function doc comment -> "integer" or "int" or allow both?
>>     integer is already implemented in CodeSniffer itself, so
>>     that would be easier"
>> what about it? simple question, simple answer... :)
> "integer" only.
>> ok. if you agree i'll do it like this:
>> i'll make the checks to be not that stricts and only check tags for
>> being there and have the right content, if it is possible to check:
>> File:    @package    Package Name
>>     @subpacke    Subpackage Name
>> Class:    @package    Package Name
>> Method: @param        Type and Comment
>>     @return        Type (no comment check, because a
>>             comment to "void" makes no sense)
>> Var:    @var        Type and Comment
>> All other Tags will be ignored (incl. @author, why is described by me in
>> the wiki). The order will be ignored, too.
>> OK?
> Perfect.
> Thanks!
> robert

More information about the TYPO3-project-5_0-general mailing list