[TYPO3-50-general] OrthoScript

[Steffen Müller]

Hi.

On 18.05.2007 00:46 Elmar Hinz wrote:
> 
> My favour of consitency is to have a single configuration language and at
> max. 3 places to work on. So I question myself, wich configuration language
> could serve all requiremets. 
> 

Good idea.
I would even like the approach to be able to configure TYPO3 without the
need of a webbrowser.
Having an API for the configuration/content object tree would make it
possile to configure a system with the users favorite tool.

>  1.) setup of the hierarchical content object tree
>  2.) easy to handle definition of a multitude of language lables
>  3.) handling of a multitude of differnt configuration parameters
> 
> I come to a clear answer. It's TS in first place, followed by YAML.
> 

+1 for TS.

P.S. I really missed an installation and configuration part in the
usability survey.

-- 
cheers,
Steffen