[TYPO3-dam-devel] RFC: defaults in dam_ttcontent/ext_conf_template.txt

[georg kuehnberger]

Ahoi Andreas,

Andreas Balzer wrote:
> Hm.. Ok. What about offering a configuration during the installation of 
> dam that configures this PageTS?

that might be an option;
however I feel rather to put this optional configuration as example into 
the new manual.

regards georg


> Greetings,
> Andreas
> On Dec 29, 2007 2:07 AM, georg kuehnberger < gk at plan2.net 
> <mailto:gk at plan2.net>> wrote:
> 
>     Peter (Paul & Marry ;-)
> 
>     +/-1, reasoning:
> 
>     a) Consider a well grown Installation with any ammount of images
>     connected to tt_content, tt_news, tx_younameit, where you'd like to
>     install DAM for usage in NEW Content-Elements. In case the original
>     field is not shown anymore, media-files of old records can't be edited
>     anymore & and AFAIR won't be shown in the FE ;-(
> 
>     b) Even considering a plain new installation, where you can may
>     configure DAM for all different kinds of Content Elements (tt_content,
>     news.), I have to disagree, simply because there's still a hughe
>     load of
>     extensions (FAQ, Glossary, fe_users ...) which dont yet feature
>     DAM-compliance, thus the second (classic) field is required;
> 
> 
>     c)
>      > Expected behaviour:
>      > I would expect that the original fields are replaced.
> 
>     IMGO, No from an admin point of view, especially as long as not ALL
>     major extensions support DAM;
> 
>     However "not showing" the old media-field, but only showning the
>     DAM-fields, for certain type of records, or within a certain branch,
>     can
>      simply be done via PageTS;
> 
>     So I'd leave it the way it is;
>     regards georg
> 
> 
>     Peter Kühn wrote:
>      > This is a svn patch request.
>      >
>      > Type: confusing behaviour
>      >
>      > Steps to reproduce:
>      > - Install dam_ttcontent
>      >
>      > Observed behaviour:
>      > Fields for dam references are added to the form for CType Image
>     and Text
>      > w/ image
>      >
>      > Expected behaviour:
>      > I would expect that the original fields are replaced. Its usefull to
>      > have the option to display both fields fx. if you have to rework
>      > existing content but i see this as the option, not the expected
>     default
>      > behaviour.
>      >
>      > pls ack
>      > grtz
>      > pekue
>      >
>      >
>      >
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>      >
>      > _______________________________________________
>      > TYPO3-team-dam mailing list
>      > TYPO3-team-dam at lists.netfielders.de
>     <mailto:TYPO3-team-dam at lists.netfielders.de>
>      > http://lists.netfielders.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/typo3-team-dam
>     _______________________________________________
>     TYPO3-team-dam mailing list
>     TYPO3-team-dam at lists.netfielders.de
>     <mailto:TYPO3-team-dam at lists.netfielders.de>
>     http://lists.netfielders.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/typo3-team-dam
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TYPO3-team-dam mailing list
> TYPO3-team-dam at lists.netfielders.de
> http://lists.netfielders.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/typo3-team-dam