[TYPO3-dam-devel] RFC: defaults in dam_ttcontent/ext_conf_template.txt

[Andreas Balzer]

Hm.. Ok. What about offering a configuration during the installation of dam
that configures this PageTS?

Greetings,
Andreas

On Dec 29, 2007 2:07 AM, georg kuehnberger <gk at plan2.net> wrote:

> Peter (Paul & Marry ;-)
>
> +/-1, reasoning:
>
> a) Consider a well grown Installation with any ammount of images
> connected to tt_content, tt_news, tx_younameit, where you'd like to
> install DAM for usage in NEW Content-Elements. In case the original
> field is not shown anymore, media-files of old records can't be edited
> anymore & and AFAIR won't be shown in the FE ;-(
>
> b) Even considering a plain new installation, where you can may
> configure DAM for all different kinds of Content Elements (tt_content,
> news.), I have to disagree, simply because there's still a hughe load of
> extensions (FAQ, Glossary, fe_users ...) which dont yet feature
> DAM-compliance, thus the second (classic) field is required;
>
>
> c)
>  > Expected behaviour:
>  > I would expect that the original fields are replaced.
>
> IMGO, No from an admin point of view, especially as long as not ALL
> major extensions support DAM;
>
> However "not showing" the old media-field, but only showning the
> DAM-fields, for certain type of records, or within a certain branch, can
>  simply be done via PageTS;
>
> So I'd leave it the way it is;
> regards georg
>
>
> Peter Kühn wrote:
> > This is a svn patch request.
> >
> > Type: confusing behaviour
> >
> > Steps to reproduce:
> > - Install dam_ttcontent
> >
> > Observed behaviour:
> > Fields for dam references are added to the form for CType Image and Text
> > w/ image
> >
> > Expected behaviour:
> > I would expect that the original fields are replaced. Its usefull to
> > have the option to display both fields fx. if you have to rework
> > existing content but i see this as the option, not the expected default
> > behaviour.
> >
> > pls ack
> > grtz
> > pekue
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TYPO3-team-dam mailing list
> > TYPO3-team-dam at lists.netfielders.de
> > http://lists.netfielders.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/typo3-team-dam
> _______________________________________________
> TYPO3-team-dam mailing list
> TYPO3-team-dam at lists.netfielders.de
> http://lists.netfielders.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/typo3-team-dam
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.netfielders.de/pipermail/typo3-team-dam/attachments/20071229/bb6c588d/attachment.htm