[Typo3-documentation] New item up for vote on DocumentTeam Meeting page

[Coby Pachmayr]

Actually... I think I will go Peter's route instead....

I will work on my own documentation... I will hire my own programmers to
make sense of the code, fix the bugs, and add my own features.
I will hire my own documentation team and work on some quality
documentation.

So if anyone is looking for extra income... let me know.

Cheers

-Coby



"Johannes Reichardt" <info at gramba.tv> wrote in message
news:mailman.45.1091290070.3867.typo3-project-documentation at lists.netfielders.de...
Sorry Coby, this might sound harsh and i am not the one who may judge
you but your postings are wasting a *lot* of time and i can´t see a lot
of sense in it. Actually its about building documentation for typo3 and
not about documentating yourself or your discussions or whatever.

- Johannes

>>What's the item that we vote for? The process of voting or what?
>>
>>You guys lost me.
>>
>>
>
>Yes.. Peter suggested that one of the first questions was "Should we use
>this method?"  So I actually decided to use his question as a way to
>demonstrate how it could work (which can be modified by anyone else who has
>any suggestions).
>
>I think it "looks" more confusing that it actually is... because I had to
>put a lot of descriptive text in to explain the idea.  But under the
>
>So under the heading "Agenda Items to Decide This Week" there are two
blocks
>which show basic formating (to demonstrate concept)... then below is an
>actual item (Peter's question) as an actual example.  But though it is an
>example... we can (if desired) "try" this process of voting... by voting on
>whether or not to use this process.
>
>It's kind of a recursive thing.
>
>I put all of the "instructions" (proposed) through out the process.  In
>other words, if you read through the Team Meeting Page, you will find the
>Agenda Items to Vote on and descriptions about that page and examples.
>
>If you click on the link "Should we use this method?" it will take you to
>page where you will see more information on voting for (or against) this
>item.
>
>Again, it's really harder to explain than use... but if you keep an open
>mind... and try it I think you will see it accomplishes the following:
>
>1.) It is an easy way to use the Wiki to discuss items to be decided
>
>2.) The structure will be very easy for others to catch-up / review all
past
>items that have been discussed in a quick and logical manner; because the
>very process "becomes" the document ... yet the document is separated from
>the discussion (like separating style from content)
>
>3.) It is democratic... but.... it also has a way to not just decide... but
>to follow up on what needs to be done.
>
>4.) Because it is democratic... even the very process itself can be
>modified... by using the process. (just like voting to change a country's
>constitution)
>
>If nobody likes it... then they won't use it.... and will essentially have
>"voted" through non-action.  After all it's just a suggestion... I'm just
>trying to resolve the problems of lots of conversation in the NG's without
>any easy way to "summarize" what has already been discussed, to clearly
>vote, then implement as well.  I'm open to anything that will help
>accomplish this.
>
>In fact... my 4 points above... will now be posted on the Discussion page
>for the question to be voted on... check it out! :-)
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Typo3-project-documentation mailing list
>Typo3-project-documentation at lists.netfielders.de
>http://lists.netfielders.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/typo3-project-document
ation
>
>
>