[TYPO3-project-4-3] MVC for 4.3?
Christoph Koehler
christoph.koehler at gmail.com
Wed Jul 2 08:36:38 CEST 2008
In article
<mailman.1.1214977971.13421.typo3-project-4-3 at lists.netfielders.de>Mart
in Kutschker <masi-no at spam-typo3.org> wrote:
> Christoph Koehler schrieb:
>> In article
>> <mailman.1.1214909004.7529.typo3-project-4-3 at lists.netfielders.de>Mar
>> ti n Kutschker <masi-no at spam-typo3.org> wrote:
>>> Peter Niederlag schrieb:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> Christoph Koehler schrieb:
>>>> In article
>>
>>>> <mailman.1.1214750149.7336.typo3-project-4-3 at lists.netfielders.de>
>>>> IngoRenner <ingo at typo3.org> wrote:
>>>> > Christoph Koehler wrote:
>>>> > Hi Christoph,
>>>> > Since gimme-five is supposed to bring FLOW3 to v4, and
>>>> FLOW3 > is the future, shouldn't we concentrate on getting that
>>>> out the> door and usable instead of inventing another MVC
>>>> mechanism?
>>>> > I disagree as the performance of FLOW3 is nowhere near
>>>> usable> at the moment.
>>>> Even so, it's still the way to go in the long run, so working
>>>> on FLOW3 performance and gimme-five should still have priority
>>>> over some new MVC solution. Especially if it's part of ECT,
>>>> progress will most likely be slow and I think time spent on the
>>>> future together is more valuable than something that will be
>>>> scrapped in a few years anyway.
>>>>
>>>> Very wise words, thx.
>>>>
>>>> I fully agree with this.
>>
>>> But if it's so far ahead it shouldn't be part of 4.x unless
>>> ready. If tha API's not stable and the performance isn't there I
>>> see no way FLOW3can be integrated as a sysext.
>>
>>> Masi
>>
>> Oh I am not talking about sysext. Sure, maybe eventually, but for
>> now I want the opportunity to start rewriting my extensions with
>> FLOW3 and have them work in v4. Installing gimme-five locally and
>> declaring it a dependency in my extensions is all I need. We can
>> talk about core inclusion later.
> So what was the point of this thread? I thought it was
> aboutadditions/changes to the Core as the name of this list implies.
The point is the discussion about a MVC framework for v4, which I
still think should be FLOW3 and gimme-five, just not right away. Since
the MVC discussion was started in this list, I thought it useful to
point to FLOW3 in said discussion. No need to be so hostile.
Christoph
--
I'm using an evaluation license of nemo since 386 days.
You should really try it!
http://www.malcom-mac.com/nemo
More information about the TYPO3-project-4-3
mailing list