[TYPO3-project-4-3] MVC for 4.3?

[Dmitry Dulepov [typo3]]

Hi!

Christoph Koehler wrote:
> In article
> <mailman.1.1214977971.13421.typo3-project-4-3 at lists.netfielders.de>Mart
> in Kutschker <masi-no at spam-typo3.org> wrote:
>>  Christoph Koehler schrieb:
>>>   In article
> 
> 
>>> <mailman.1.1214909004.7529.typo3-project-4-3 at lists.netfielders.de>Mar
>>>  ti n Kutschker <masi-no at spam-typo3.org> wrote:
>>>>    Peter Niederlag schrieb:
>>>>>     Hello,
>>>>>     
>>>>>     Christoph Koehler schrieb:
>>>>>     In article
>>>   
> 
> 
>>>>> <mailman.1.1214750149.7336.typo3-project-4-3 at lists.netfielders.de>
>>>>>  IngoRenner <ingo at typo3.org> wrote:
>>>>>  >    Christoph Koehler wrote:
>>>>>  >    Hi Christoph,
>>>>>  >     Since gimme-five is supposed to bring FLOW3 to v4, and
>>>>> FLOW3 > is the future, shouldn't we concentrate on getting that
>>>>> out the> door and usable instead of inventing another MVC
>>>>>  mechanism?
>>>>>  >    I disagree as the performance of FLOW3 is nowhere near
>>>>> usable> at the  moment.
>>>>>     Even so, it's still the way to go in the long run, so working
>>>>> on FLOW3 performance and gimme-five should still have priority
>>>>> over some new MVC solution. Especially if it's part of ECT,
>>>>> progress will most likely be slow and I think time spent on the
>>>>> future together is more valuable than something that will be
>>>>> scrapped in a few years anyway.
>>>>>     
>>>>>     Very wise words, thx.
>>>>>     
>>>>>     I fully agree with this.
>>>   
>>>>    But if it's so far ahead it shouldn't be part of 4.x unless
>>>> ready. If tha API's not stable and the performance isn't there I
>>>> see no way FLOW3can be integrated as a sysext.
>>>   
>>>>    Masi
>>>   
>>>   Oh I am not talking about sysext. Sure, maybe eventually, but for
>>> now I want the opportunity to start rewriting my extensions with
>>> FLOW3 and have them work in v4. Installing gimme-five locally and
>>> declaring it a dependency in my extensions is all I need. We can
>>> talk about core inclusion later.
> 
>>  So what was the point of this thread? I thought it was
>> aboutadditions/changes to the Core as the name of this list implies.
> 
> The point is the discussion about a MVC framework for v4, which I
> still think should be FLOW3 and gimme-five, just not right away. Since
> the MVC discussion was started in this list, I thought it useful to
> point to FLOW3 in said discussion. No need to be so hostile.

<offtopic>Let's start removing unnecessary quoting ;) Otherwise it is forces scrolling in news client.</offtopic>

-- 
Dmitry Dulepov
http://typo3bloke.net/