[TYPO3-GSoC] Fluid Boilerplates Status Update

[Robert Weißgraeber]

Am 01.06.2013 um 11:00 schrieb Sebastian Kurfürst <sebastian at typo3.org>:

> Hey Jacob,
> 
> I'll just provide some feedback here, hope that's OK :-)
> 
> 
>> Update: 31 May 2013
>> 
>> ☠ I need more feedback on the naming of the packages
>> http://forum.typo3.org/index.php/m/686590
>> -    Is BuilderBase ok? What about BuilderAbstract, BuilderNucleus,
>> BuilderFoundation?
> Actually, I prefer BuilderFoundation; but maybe we can gather some more
> feedback f.e. of Rens (who is involved with the Package Builder) before
> we decide on a final name.

Maybe we can Set up a tricider and float that link around buzz, ML, ...



> 
>> ⓘ I will be working in my namespace, Cognifire, until everything is
>> ready to be pushed to git.typo3.org
> +1 very good idea!
> 
>> ⓘ Current naming choices
>> -    TemplateBuilder (instead of FluidBuilder)
> +1
> 
>> -    SourceTemplate (instead of NakedBoilerplate, RawTemplate, etc)
> +-0 on this one, but a lot better than the other ones.
> 
>> ⓘ Current plans and notes available (newest first):
>> -   
>> http://cognifloyd.blogspot.com/2013/05/boilerplates-and-builders-in-typo3-neos.html
> some feedback here:
> 
>  * MigrationService: I'd suggest to look at the code migration service;
>    it stores the applied migrations in the git commit messages, and I
>    think this also makes sense for your builders.
> 
> 
> Very good work :-) Looking forward to see some results and further
> iterations!
> 
> Greets,
> Sebastian
> _______________________________________________
> TYPO3-gsoc mailing list
> TYPO3-gsoc at lists.typo3.org
> http://lists.typo3.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/typo3-gsoc