[TYPO3-dev] CSC and ContentRendering Team
Georg Ringer
mail-spam at ringerge.org
Wed Feb 18 22:40:47 CET 2009
Steffen Ritter wrote:
> Denyer Ec schrieb:
>> many 3rd party extensions rely on the CSC markup structure for correct
>> operation. I'd hope none *depend* on it, but my instincts say
>> otherwise.
Sure some of my extensions depend on csc because I need to put sometimes
my code just in between. ;)
IMO this is not a big problem to change because most of the extensions
in this area are developed activly.
> Many do... Look at all lightbox stuff, ringer extensions, frame
> extensions etc. they are based on changing ts code of csc.
I still don't know how I should feel about getting a kind of synonym ;)
Extensions like rgaccordion are more like a container of some lines of
TS, js and css files. This can easly be adopted.
> - We also should provide a css set using as less classes as possible -
> but meaningful names.
absolutly a +1
This can be also the other way round: Add an extra cleaning TS which
deletes all the not needed class names and so on.
I really don't have a problem with a 2nd improved static ts template of
csc which can be added to every new project. Old projects can just use
the old csc.
I don't need any radio button but of of course some help for all type of
users how to work with the new features and a changelog.
Is there a place we could share the snippets we use everytime because I
don't like to use the mailinglist for that. Maybe forge or the wiki?
Georg
More information about the TYPO3-dev
mailing list