[TYPO3-typo3org] "Sites made with TYPO3"
sa at externes-management.de
Fri May 2 10:19:37 CEST 2008
I do share your concern regarding rating when personal interests and
money are involved.
At the same time I disagree when it comes to "which websites deserve
to be there"!
It would be bad to see _only_ small projects on the first page. It
would be _as_ bad to see only huge websites of big companies up there.
TYPO3 has the reputation to be very flexible yet very complex...
Useful for big projects ...
IMHO TYPO3 is also efficiently usable for small and medium size
projects on a high quality level and that is an important message,
too. Showing a good mixture of projects would serve TYPO3 and the
----- Nachricht von nospam at aoemedia.de ---------
Datum: Fri, 2 May 2008 07:42:10 +0000
Von: "Kian T. Gould" <nospam at aoemedia.de>
Antwort an: "TYPO3.org team" <typo3-team-typo3org at lists.netfielders.de>
Betreff: Re: [TYPO3-typo3org] "Sites made with TYPO3"
An: typo3-team-typo3org at lists.netfielders.de
> Hi guys
> Thanks a lot for this new extension which was IMHO very overdue. I think
> the features are getting there now but after a first trial we noticed a
> major flaw of the system, which is the voting ability. We added our
> largest and most complex reference CISCO Systems to the list, which is
> currently definitely the biggest reference on the list because so far
> mostly small projects were added and what happened? It was voted down by
> a lot of people that added small projects and voted for them themselves
> and is now not even under the Top sites anymore. When a potential
> corporation interested in using TYPO3 sees these Top sites, they
> probably would think that TYPO3 is a small community platform and not
> suitable for their needs and rather turn to other systems which is
> exactly what we don't want with a system like this. This way again we
> have an unqualified listing of references that has some more info but is
> in no way more differenciating than the old system.
> There are two sites there right now that deserve to be their IMHO, those
> being fotobuch AG and Tourismus Hamburg (and CISCO of course :-) ) but
> the rest is really not a great presentation of the TYPO3 power.
> Therefore I would like to open the discussion to ideas and suggestions
> how a voting process could be done in a way that the Top sites are
> really representations of the power of TYPO3 and not a result of voting
> manipulation. If you totally don't agree with me please also give your
> input, maybe I am looking at this from the wrong perspective.
> Best Regards
> TYPO3-team-typo3org mailing list
> TYPO3-team-typo3org at lists.netfielders.de
----- Ende der Nachricht von nospam at aoemedia.de -----
More information about the TYPO3-team-typo3org