[Typo3-typo3org] Fwd: http://typo3.org/extensions/ - Change Navigation & Impression

[Michael Scharkow]

David Bruehlmeier wrote:

> Sorry, but I think this is complete no-go and would totally ruin the 
> credibility of the rating system. Why should I even bother to vote when 
> I know that my vote is 100 times less valuable than the vote from 
> somebody else? I do see the point that known TYPO3 experts such as 
> Robert or Rubert certainly can better judge if an extension is really 
> good, but if you want to reflect this in a rating system, but *must* be 
> transparent to everybody.
> 
> Suggestion: Split the rating in two seperate counts: One count for 
> everybody who cares to vote. And another (like cigars :-) or whatever) 
> can only be voted for only by the "experts". So an extension can have 39 
> points and two cigars (which would be the two votes from experts). The 
> votes for the cigars should be clearly labeled as to who awarded them, 
> whereas the other votes might be anonymous.
> 
> The question remains who decides who's an expert and who's not. Maybe 
> the R+D committee could decide? I'm not sure about this point...

Full ack.

Cheers,
Michael