[Typo3-typo3org] documentation.typo3.org

[Michael Scharkow]

Jan-Hendrik Heuing [NF] wrote:

> I just can't believe that a discussion like this comes up while having typo3 
> doing rich text editing and all sorts of things. Why having a CONTENT 
> MANAGEMENT system which we do not use for documentation?

Because I am not convinced that this is as easy: Do you want all 
extension authors to have BE access (which is basically required for RTE 
editing until now)?

> Beside this being bad advertising, I suggest to more think about how to 
> transfer timtaw-content to docbook or something the like!

If we want pure client-side documentation writing, exports are not too 
difficult. But the problem is that people want BOTH offline and online 
editing capabilities (so it seems), so we have to fully implement 
oowriter in TYPO3, kinda at least.
It seems like we are having the same goals as those people asking on the 
lists how they can manage a website with TYPO3 by just uploading 
doc-files written by their users... This stinks because TYPO3 is a WEB CMS.


Greetings,
Michael