typo3 at ingo-renner.com
Wed Apr 13 22:51:00 CEST 2005
Am Wed, 13 Apr 2005 14:21:33 +0200 schrieb Kasper Skårhøj:
> On DocBook:
> - The format is NO option if authors cannot author it with a graphical
> tool like OO; It is more important that writing documentation is easy to
> do that semantically correct. However, can both be obtained it is fine
> with me.
> - IMAGES: If Docbook cannot easily support the inclusion of images it is
> no option either. In Open Office it is a copy/paste thing, it must be as
> easy as that. It might be acceptable that a file is written to disc
> first and then selected.
These are two really important points! I guess you might convince some
'Linux-freaks' (not offending someone) to change to docbook or whatever,
but you can't convince for exampe first time extension developers and
propably windows users, too.
If I think of my own, it would be hard for you to convince me to switch to
docbook w/o having a comfortable WYSIWYG/GUI editor, too ;-)
Use a newsreader! Check out
More information about the TYPO3-team-typo3org