[TYPO3-ect] lib/div 1.0 - it's time to say thank you

Ernesto Baschny [cron IT] ernst at cron-it.de
Wed Jan 10 18:11:49 CET 2007


Elmar HInz wrote: on 10.01.2007 11:44:

>> Just for the record, I also +1 the usage of Smarty! PHP templates are
>> also ok to some degree.. But come on, TYPO3 templates makes no sense at
>> all when you want to separate business logic from presentation logic.
>> Smarty does that job pretty well.

> Antithesis. 
> 
> It depends on what you do in the php template. As long as you use the same
> conditions and iterators in a PHP template as you would use them in smarty
> template, there is absolutely no difference for the seperation of logic.
> It's just a different templating language. One of many.
> 
> PHP has been a templating language from the very beginning. 

Exactly, that's why I also find it better to use PHP as the "templating
engine" than TYPO3 templates. The only drawback of pure PHP is that it
its templating tags are a bit more error prone than smarty. E.g.:

<? if: ?>
<? else: ?>
<? endif; ?>

{if}
{else}
{/if}

other than that I see no reason not to use PHP templates. So I don't see
what you mean with antithesis, as we both seem to have the same opinion? :)

Cheers,
Ernesto


More information about the TYPO3-team-extension-coordination mailing list