[TYPO3-ect] Zend style extensions scheme

Elmar Hinz elmar.DOT.hinz at team.MINUS.red.DOT.net
Wed Mar 22 10:58:30 CET 2006


Peter Niederlag schrieb:
> 
> Would it make sense to "flatten" to always flatten the extension-key, at
> least for naming of directories? Could we handle such a big change?
> 

Hello Peter,

last week I provided a patch for TER2 that checks that the key lalala
will not be given if la_la_la is already registered. It's already
online. One step forward to unique pathes at least.

I would propose to forbid underscores in new keys at all. That would
also be a preparation for a migration to PEAR style where underscores
have special functionality.

I would like to see camelStyledKeys instead. Do you think that would
cause problems with DB names and filesystem on WIN?

Where is the underscore version of keys used at all?
I think that is only in the pathes to the extension. Am I right?
All other uses of the key are of the flattend version? Right?
All calls for files go through the extMgm?
Then we could indeed flatten all keys with one automated skript. Only
hardcoded pathes would break.

Regards

Elmar














More information about the TYPO3-team-extension-coordination mailing list