[TYPO3-core] Changing behavior of the TEXT cObject

Markus Klein klein.t3 at mfc-linz.at
Thu Feb 6 13:04:45 CET 2014

> -----Original Message-----
> From: typo3-team-core-bounces at lists.typo3.org [mailto:typo3-team-core-
> bounces at lists.typo3.org] On Behalf Of JoH asenau
> Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 12:45 PM
> To: typo3-team-core at lists.typo3.org
> Subject: Re: [TYPO3-core] Changing behavior of the TEXT cObject
> > This would not even be a breaking change and you don't have to replace
> > the whole TypoScript code, since it will be fully backwards compatible.
> >
> > So adding stdWrap on the first level would be a real improvement.
> BTW: There is no problem having to "unset" other root properties like i.e.
> "value" in TEXT or "file" in IMAGE, since this will be done automatically by
> stdWrap internally.
> There was a team at a workshop at the developer days before 4.5 checking
> all the appearances of the different properties and they did not find any
> doubles while comparing root level methods of cObjects with stdWrap
> methods.

Great, good to know that has been checked!

> Additionally we built in an array with "allowed" stdWrap methods, that is
> intersected with the incoming properties and leaves just the official stdWrap
> properties in place.
> So it would be easy to do, backwards compatible and more comfortable for
> the integrators to introduce root level stdWrap methods for each cObject.

Then lets go for this, if it makes things for integrators easier and doesn't harm us code wise.

> Joey
> --
> Wenn man keine Ahnung hat: Einfach mal Fresse halten!
> (If you have no clues: simply shut your gob sometimes!) Dieter Nuhr,
> German comedian
> Xing: http://contact.cybercraft.de
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/bunnyfield
> TYPO3 cookbook (2nd edition): http://www.typo3experts.com

Kind regards

Markus Klein
TYPO3 CMS Active Contributors Team Member

More information about the TYPO3-team-core mailing list