[TYPO3-core] RFC #11449: Forgotten text in backend.php

Xavier Perseguers typo3 at perseguers.ch
Tue Jun 30 11:45:52 CEST 2009


Hi Benni,

>> I did not read the other corresponding RFC with text switchtouser but
>> why does it read like that? I mean it should be proper cased with
>>
>> switchToUser and switchToUserShort or switch_to_user and
>> switch_to_user_short, shouldn't it?
> 
> Easy answer:
> 
>   <label index="switchtouser">Switch to User</label>
> + <label index="switchtousershort">SU:</label>
> 
> He left the "switchtouser" and only added "switchtousershort". He just 
> had it as consistent as it can be :). However, we should find some 

Of course, I know how to read a patch ;-)

> conventions on how DB field names should look like and how LLL labels 
> should look like (camelcase, underscore handling etc).

That was the point of my question. It is obvious that the format is not 
good, even for the other key. But even if it would be a different RFC, 
well, it could as well be done in the same for both keys.

-- 
Xavier Perseguers
DBAL-Member

http://xavier.perseguers.ch/en/tutorials/typo3.html


More information about the TYPO3-team-core mailing list