[TYPO3-core] RFC #11474: Store separate extlist for the frontend

[Benjamin Mack]

Hey Rupi,

well, that's a matter of taste, but if I "activate" the checkbox in the 
installer that is called "noIconProc", I wonder *every time* if this 
means that I activated the disactivation of the icon processing feature. 
To me, that is confusing (you know, just my personal opinion).

loadInFE => true (default, and if not set, true as well)

but can be disabled.

Although I think "modes" is perfect to use (as we already have the 
TYPO3_MODE == 'BE') in all the ext_tables and every ext dev knows what 
it means, I could agree on a different wording.

Anyways, again, this is just a matter of taste. I will focus on your 
actual code, I'll review this today.

All the best,
Benni.


On 16.07.2009 0:11 Uhr, Rupert Germann wrote:
> Benjamin Mack wrote:
>> On 15.07.2009 15:56 Uhr, Dmitry Dulepov wrote:
>>> Better idea:
>>> 'modes' =>   'FE,BE,CLI',
>>>
>>> For compatibility empty means all.
>>>
>> I like this way better as well. I hate these options "doNotDoBla" as
>> it's so confusing.
>
> what's confusing on "Do not" ?!
> I'd say "modes" is way more confusing, because the term "mode" is used for
> all and everything.
>
> Come on dudes, this is getting a bit overconstructed.
> Where are the use cases for "modes" FE and CLI?
> This patch is mostly about FE performance. I don't currently see a usecase
> where one could benefit from loading an extension only in FE.
> and by adding more options (that will possibly never used in realworld) we
> only add more error possibilities.
>
> greets
> rupert
>