[TYPO3-core] IRRE implementation bugs
Martin Kutschker
martin.kutschker-n0spam at no5pam-blackbox.net
Sat Oct 20 18:41:13 CEST 2007
Kasper Skårhøj (GMAIL) schrieb:
>>>
>>
>> Well, that's not quite true. When you look at moving or copying of
>> records, IRRE children are always copied/moved along with the parent.
>> (That is also why it's highly suggested to disable showing IRRE child
>> tables in the list module.)
>> So in those cases, they ARE treated as one object inside TYPO3s core as
>> well.
>
> OK, but thats a bit I don't get. Why shouldn't it be possible to share a
> child between two records as we can with normal group fields?
>
> In an implementation with these constraints, it has many implications
> for the core parts elsewhere. What if I make a copy of a child? What if
> I move it? What if I delete it? What if I link to it from another
> record? Am I not then breaking the concept of "exclusive parenthood"?
You're question lead to one answer: a child record may neither be listed
not manipulated on it's own. TCEmain must decline any command that
request this and Web>Page, Web>List etc should honour this as well.
Masi
More information about the TYPO3-team-core
mailing list