[TYPO3-v4] TinyMCE vs htmlArea RTE
Kay Strobach
typo3 at kay-strobach.de
Mon Jul 4 19:01:36 CEST 2011
Hi guys,
it takes one and a half our to basicly integrate the aloha editor to the be.
This ultra alpha has no link/image wizard.
http://blog.kay-strobach.de/index.php/2011/07/aloha-editor-im-typo3-backend/
Regards
Kay
Am 04.07.2011 17:17, schrieb Kay Strobach:
> Hi Stan,
>
> size always matters.
> Think about the ressources which are needed during runtime.
> I do not have checked your code - just have taken a look on the file sizes.
>
> I don't wanna force you to change the editor - just wanted to say, when
> the editor is changed - why not to use the same in v4 and v5?
> This way we could join the forces in v4 and v5 ;)
>
> Perhaps Aloha is a good choice, but perhaps we need a special version?
>
> Thanks in advice
> Kay
>
> Am 30.06.2011 16:53, schrieb Stanislas Rolland:
>> Hi Kay,
>>
>>>> Kay Strobach wrote:
>> [...]
>>>
>>> The aloha editor (<1MB) is less heavy than the htmlarea (>3MB) ...
>>> (removed extjs before summing up).
>>>
>> When all features are enabled, the size of the minified JS script of
>> htmlArea RTE is 408K. When gzip compression is used (compression level
>> of 5), the size is 88K. In any case, the script is cached by the
>> browser. So why does it matter?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Stan
>>
>
>
--
http://www.kay-strobach.de - Open Source Rocks
TYPO3 .... inspiring people to share!
Get involved: http://typo3.org
More information about the TYPO3-project-v4
mailing list