[TYPO3-v4] TinyMCE vs htmlArea RTE

Kay Strobach typo3 at kay-strobach.de
Mon Jul 4 17:17:24 CEST 2011


Hi Stan,

size always matters.
Think about the ressources which are needed during runtime.
I do not have checked your code - just have taken a look on the file sizes.

I don't wanna force you to change the editor - just wanted to say, when
the editor is changed - why not to use the same in v4 and v5?
This way we could join the forces in v4 and v5 ;)

Perhaps Aloha is a good choice, but perhaps we need a special version?

Thanks in advice
Kay

Am 30.06.2011 16:53, schrieb Stanislas Rolland:
> Hi Kay,
> 
>>> Kay Strobach wrote:
> [...]
>>
>> The aloha editor (<1MB) is less heavy than the htmlarea (>3MB) ...
>> (removed extjs before summing up).
>>
> When all features are enabled, the size of the minified JS script of
> htmlArea RTE is 408K. When gzip compression is used (compression level
> of 5), the size is 88K. In any case, the script is cached by the
> browser. So why does it matter?
> 
> Regards,
> Stan
> 


-- 
http://www.kay-strobach.de - Open Source Rocks

TYPO3 .... inspiring people to share!
Get involved: http://typo3.org


More information about the TYPO3-project-v4 mailing list