[TYPO3-v4] TinyMCE vs htmlArea RTE
Kay Strobach
typo3 at kay-strobach.de
Mon Jul 4 17:17:24 CEST 2011
Hi Stan,
size always matters.
Think about the ressources which are needed during runtime.
I do not have checked your code - just have taken a look on the file sizes.
I don't wanna force you to change the editor - just wanted to say, when
the editor is changed - why not to use the same in v4 and v5?
This way we could join the forces in v4 and v5 ;)
Perhaps Aloha is a good choice, but perhaps we need a special version?
Thanks in advice
Kay
Am 30.06.2011 16:53, schrieb Stanislas Rolland:
> Hi Kay,
>
>>> Kay Strobach wrote:
> [...]
>>
>> The aloha editor (<1MB) is less heavy than the htmlarea (>3MB) ...
>> (removed extjs before summing up).
>>
> When all features are enabled, the size of the minified JS script of
> htmlArea RTE is 408K. When gzip compression is used (compression level
> of 5), the size is 88K. In any case, the script is cached by the
> browser. So why does it matter?
>
> Regards,
> Stan
>
--
http://www.kay-strobach.de - Open Source Rocks
TYPO3 .... inspiring people to share!
Get involved: http://typo3.org
More information about the TYPO3-project-v4
mailing list