[TYPO3-mvc] Including dynamic JavaScript using Tx_Fluid_View_StandaloneView [solution]

[Thomas Kieslich]

Hi, general Solution like JSViewhelper will be good. Another, for me 
easier Method, is use of CDATA Parts.
Example:
	<script type="text/javascript">
			<![CDATA[
				var parameters = {
					src: "]]>{settings.simple.url.stream}<![CDATA[",
					autoPlay: "false",
					verbose: false,
					controlBarAutoHide: "true",
					controlBarPosition: "bottom",
					controlBarMode: "docked",
					urlIncludesFMSApplicationInstance: "true",
					poster: "images/poster.png",
					volume: .05
				};

				// Embed the player SWF:
				swfobject.embedSWF
				(
				"]]>{settings.playerPath}<![CDATA[",
				"MediaPlayback]]>{uid}<![CDATA[",
			]]>{settings.simple.width}<![CDATA[,
			]]>{settings.simple.height}<![CDATA[,
				"10.1.0",
				"flash/expressInstall.swf",
				parameters,
				{
					allowFullScreen: "true"
				},
				{
					name: "MediaPlayback]]>{uid}<![CDATA["
				});
			]]>
			//VideoJs
			<![CDATA[
				VideoJS.setupAllWhenReady({
					controlsBelow: false, // Display control bar below video instead of 
in front of
					controlsHiding: true, // Hide controls when mouse is not over the video
					defaultVolume: 0.55, // Will be overridden by user's last volume if 
available
					useBrowserControls: false // Dont' use the video JS controls (iPhone)
				});
			]]>
	</script>

Its just another Way, Thomas

Am 14.12.2010 20:11, schrieb Fernando Arconada:
> There is a feature request in the issue tracker related to an alternative
> fluid syntax and managing header parts inside fluid templates
>
> El Tue, 14 Dec 2010 10:45:27 +0100, Steffen Müller escribió:
>
>> Hi Michiel,
>>
>> On 11.12.2010 20:40 Michiel Roos [netcreators] wrote:
>>>
>>> The downside to this approach is that fluid has a hard time with braces
>>> in templates. This is of course because JS also uses those braces a
>>> lot.
>>>
>>> My solution is to replace all the { in the JS with: {openingBrace} and
>>> all the } with {closingBrace}. And then all is fine
>>>
>>>
>> I'd rather like to see it the other way round. Leaving { and } unparsed
>> and use alternative delimiters for fluid. For example: ###blog.title###
>> ? *lol*
>> Could this be achieved by using some kind of JS viewHelper?
>