[TYPO3-templavoila] 1.1.1
Dmitry Dulepov
dmitry at typo3.org
Wed Oct 11 14:48:56 CEST 2006
Hi!
Franz Koch wrote:
> ok, I see the problem. But wouldn't it be "better" to remove the
> directive for the object path?
It was a choice too but I decided to preserve data. Better preserve than
loose. But now I think it could be a better solution...
> Well, this only works in the main DS and not in the local processing
> field, so any changes made are lost on a DS update.
Interesting, I need to check this. You should be able to change content
of <TypoScript> tag by local processing.
> Or ignoring the TSObjPath in main DS but allowing in local processing DS?
They are merged together. I expected that local processing will override
<TypoScript> in DS.
--
Dmitry Dulepov
Web: http://typo3bloke.net/
Skype: callto:liels_bugs
"It is our choices, that show what we truly are,
far more than our abilities." (A.P.W.B.D.)
More information about the TYPO3-project-templavoila
mailing list