[TYPO3-templavoila] TemplaVoila v/s Traditional Templating (Template AutoParser, TypoScript etc.)

Tapio Markula tapio.markula at atwebteam.com
Sat Dec 2 22:27:12 CET 2006

shikeb kirjoitti:
> Gideon So wrote:
>> Hi Shikeb,
>>     IMO, templavoila is the simplest way to build a template. And it 
>> is easy to learn. Just check out the futuristic template Building (FTB).
>> Gideon
>> shikeb wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> I am a relatively new Typo3 user and so far I've used only 
>>> TemplaVoila for all my templating and I've really enjoyed using it 
>>> and the idea of Flexible Content elements. But since I haven't used 
>>> the older method till now, can any gentleman on this list tell me the 
>>> differences between TemplaVoila and other available methods for 
>>> creating templates. And the pros and cons and the benefits of using 
>>> one technique over the other. Or is there any document available 
>>> which I can use for a quick answer to my queries.
>>> Thanks in advance.
>>> Regards,
>>> Syed S. Rahman.
> Thanks, Dmitry and Gideon, for your kind words. I wanted to know whether 
>   flexible content elements can be emulated the traditional way.

can - kb_nescefe - the version, which I used had a bug in fronted file
(missing termination (}) from a function.
That's simple to use and very userfriendly for end users - IMO simpler 
for endusers than flexible content elements of TemplaVoila.

Doesn't need any markers.

More information about the TYPO3-project-templavoila mailing list