[TYPO3] Hosting typo3 on a vps?
Nagita Karunaratne
nagita.k at gmail.com
Mon Aug 28 19:50:48 CEST 2006
Generally a VPS will have more consistent performance than shared hosting
since you are guaranteed certain resources. I also have more control and it
is easier to allocate more memory to php, modify max upload file size, etc.
performance has been quite consistent - i have not experienced much
variation in speed.
Shared hosts generally vary more and so it is difficult to make general
statements. Much cheaper though.
If your site is ok, why switch?
I think rimuhosting has a 30 day money back guarantee
On 8/28/06, He Shiming NOSPAM <mailbill at 21cn.com.nospam> wrote:
>
> "Nagita Karunaratne" <nagita.k at gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:mailman.473.1156754636.11906.typo3-english at lists.netfielders.de...
> > Shared hosting is much cheaper but it can also be much slower. I have
> used
> > shared with T3 and had a bad experience.
> >
> > I am running a test instance on a VPS with 96 MB and it is not bad. In 3
> > months it has not given any problems.
> >
> > I don't know how a big site will do but you may need more memory. You
> can
> > start with a small plan and add more if you have problems.
> >
> >
>
> By "not given any problems", do you mean you experienced a performance
> boost? My website is not that big, and the situation is not that bad with
> my
> shared hosting account.
>
> But when I turn debug on, I saw that the pages take somewhere between
> 500ms
> to 1200ms to generate. And cached pages take 95ms to 250ms to generate. I
> manually published some of the pages into static files, and of course, the
> performance improved dramatically.
>
> Did you measure the page generation time between shared hosting and VPS?
>
> Best regards,
> He Shiming
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TYPO3-english mailing list
> TYPO3-english at lists.netfielders.de
> http://lists.netfielders.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/typo3-english
>
More information about the TYPO3-english
mailing list