[Typo3-dev] Red Hat Content Accelerator?

[Peter Russ]

Hi Ruv,

do you already use real static files as a lot of your page is static? If 
not, this could reduce the load dramatically.

Regs Peter.

Reuven Cohen wrote:
> My problem lately is purely related to peak traffic times.  I'm getting
> upwards to 60,000 unique visitors a day, something like 200,000 pages views.
> Even though I'm running two fairly highend servers, with mysql and apache
> running on seperate servers, the load still spikes quite high. I'm just
> trying to figure out a way to speed things up a bit.
> 
> 
> ruv
> www.ruv.net
> 
> "Jan-Hendrik Heuing [netfielders]" <jh at netfielders.de> wrote in message
> news:mailman.1.1093986367.19314.typo3-dev at lists.netfielders.de...
> 
>>Generaly not. It really depends on your situation.
>>
>>If you have a dedicated environment, and you have lots of static files,
> 
> that
> 
>>I'd say it's worth going for it.
>>
>>If you have a shared hosting environment with lots of clients on it, using
>>mostly dynamic pages... In this case, I'd say administration is too much
>>work, and gain would not be much anyway if most of it is dynamic.
>>
>>I also thought about giving it another chance in the context of having a
>>dedicated environment with a website producing static files or something
> 
> the
> 
>>like. But if you use Typo3 and you do not publish pages, it's not worth
> 
> the
> 
>>effort I think.
>>
>>JH
>>
>>"Reuven Cohen" <ruv at ruv.net> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
>>news:mailman.1.1093979460.11477.typo3-dev at lists.netfielders.de...
>>
>>>So it seems to be bad idea?
>>>
>>>ruv
>>>
>>>
>>>"Jan-Hendrik Heuing [netfielders]" <jh at netfielders.de> wrote in message
>>>news:mailman.1.1093974767.4671.typo3-dev at lists.netfielders.de...
>>>
>>>>About 2 yearsago,we did some experiments, and for a while we had it
>>>
>>>running
>>>
>>>>as well. For static files we could send out about 10 times as much
> 
> files
> 
>>>>compared to apache, in some experiments a lot more. But tux is only for
>>>>static files. Well, there are these userspace modules, but I don't know
>>>
>>>much
>>>
>>>>about those,the php user module was not available that time...
>>>>
>>>>If I remember right, redhat9 is already coming with anything needed in
>>>>the
>>>>kernel, that was a pain to install when we did those experiments.
>>>>
>>>>We did finaly stop using it, as it was a little difficult to use it in
> 
> a
> 
>>>>shared hosting environment. The problem is that tux does not know about
>>>>virtual hosts, just in some standard way. Every domain had to be set up
>>>
>>>as
>>>
>>>>a directory, which is mostly not the case. We solved this via a LOT
>>>>symlinks...
>>>>
>>>>tux is really fast, but I am not sure if this is developed any further.
>>>>Version 2.2 is already very old, today I'd also have a look at thttpd,
>>>
>>>which
>>>
>>>>we did not do any experiments with those days...
>>>>
>>>>Jan-Hendrik
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Reuven Cohen" <ruv at ruv.net> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
>>>>news:mailman.1.1093966277.26345.typo3-dev at lists.netfielders.de...
>>>>
>>>>>Anyone using Red Hat Content Accelerator 2.2?
>>>>>
>>>>>I'm thinking about installing it on my server.
>>>>>
>>>>>see >>
> 
> http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/tux/TUX-2.2-Manual/intro.html