[TYPO3-50-general] New templating system?
Ries van Twisk
typo3 at rvt.dds.nl
Tue Mar 23 18:06:26 CET 2010
On Mar 23, 2010, at 11:58 AM, Duch (aka. Grégory Duchesnes) wrote:
> Le 23 mars 2010 à 08:26, Martin Kutschker a écrit :
>> Thomas Fritz schrieb:
>>> I do not know TypoScript and i do not know FLUID. I only SAW the
>>> syntax in
>>> documentations and so... And i have to say that i feel much more
>>> with FLUID and i think it is easier to learn IMHO, because of its
>>> HTML like
>>> Syntax. Just wanted to share my feeling about that...
>> But FLUID and TypoScript have different goals. FLUID is designed to
>> create XML/HTML (and plain text)
>> with the possibility and need to take care about each necessary XML/
>> HTML element, but it has not
>> much logic (besides conditions). TypoScript OTOH is a way to
>> describe and configure objects that
>> will be eventually be rendered as XML/HTML/text. The basic syntax
>> is simple and should be familiar
>> to any programmer as it uses the wide-spread dot-notation
>> Of course you could cramp all the configuration needed to create
>> the final output into the template,
>> but it would make your life not easier. The template designer,
>> which very possibly is no programmer
>> at all, would have to worry about all the extra stuff he doesn't
>> undertand. And what's more you rid
>> yourself of any reuse of the template.
>> If you want to mix html with business logic all in one file use
>> Smarty ;)
> I don't want to be rude, but if you look at the index.html used in
> the Extbase tutorial there are Fluid markers on almost every line.
> Once such markup is added, i feel the template will be much harder
> to maintain (how do you feed it to the W3C validator for example?)
Totally agreed here...
I think this is why people like TV so much, you drop in a other
template from a designer, tell TV to update and off you go.
No tedious re-mapping and stuff!
More information about the TYPO3-project-5_0-general