[TYPO3-UG US] Status of TYPO3.us

[Zach Davis]

Christopher wrote:
> On 12/17/05, Zach Davis <zach at castironcoding.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Yes! But I don't know how this has turned into an either/or
> proposition; if the project will be distributed as a complete site in
> a tarball, and the goal is to teach users how to template a site, why
> not just figure out how many methods there actually _are_ (I say
> two...), and make a site based on each one? This would involve
> relatively little extra work, and could be used to demonstrate a
> useful feature of Typo3--multiple sites in one tree.

I think Christopher's idea is a good one, and a good compromise -- why 
not use the same template, integrated in three different ways, as an 
example of different methods of putting together a template. We could 
clearly label the approach Alex and others advocate as a basic or 
foundational approach, but we could also make the other two approaches 
(MTB and FTB) available as well and and note that they're more advanced. 
I would be happy to do the extra work involved.

Alex, how do you feel about this idea?

best,
Zach