[TYPO3-doc] http://typo3.org/the-brand/the-typo3-family/

[Steffen Gebert]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Martin and Francois,

as Francois said, *this* list isn't the right one.

But *yes*, lists are the right place. Thank you for being the first one
having the idea to discuss things in more than 160 chars!

Kind regards
Steffen

- -- 
Steffen Gebert
TYPO3 CMS Core Team Member
TYPO3 Server Administration Team Member

TYPO3 .... inspiring people to share!
Get involved: http://typo3.org

I work for TYPO3 solely in my spare time. If you think that
my work helps you running your business, you are invited to
send me a donation via PayPal to this email address. Thanks

On 10/7/12 8:45 PM, François Suter wrote:
> Hi Martin,
> 
>> http://typo3.org/the-brand/the-typo3-family/
>>
>> I must say that I'm really shocked and totally demotivated.
> 
> Please don't be, we need you :-)
> 
> Change is not easy, but is needed. Things evolve all the time. Sometimes
> it flows in a direction we like and we're happy about the change (like
> moving the documentation from OpenOffice to ReST ;-) ), and sometimes we
> don't like it and it's harder to swallow.
> 
>> Why is the green of the logo gone? And note: Everything is "TYPO3
>> something" now, but there is no "TYPO3" itself (I mean: *The* TYPO3
>> original product) any more.
>>
>> Go to http://typo3.org : The product TYPO3, *the* TYPO3 that created the
>> strong brand has no identity any more. What a disaster.
> 
> Please think of Apache. We always refer to the web server as "Apache",
> but it's real name is "Apache HTTP Server Project". Apache has become a
> brand to which many projects are attached.
> 
> Anyway this list is certainly not the right place to discuss the change.
> 
>> Did somebody else in the documentation team know that it was planned to
>> both rename TYPO3 to TYPO3 CMS and change the logo?
> 
> I don't think anyone did. I was aware of an ongoing rebranding effort,
> but I hadn't had any news since many months. I don't mind, I'm sure the
> people involved were really serious about it and weighed the pros and
> cons of every alternative. There would always have been people
> displeased with any possible solution. I hope you will get used to and
> come to appreciate the new scheme.
> 
> Cheers
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQcmhRAAoJEIskG/rSlyw4jA4H/0oOoxBa0yaQp7CamsTJHyXW
kxv8KDWL/2US51vTAJHSq5a8zOokLNDWj+q/VDWCdtrr7PXBf6CM2yggpVKM2kjg
xnDOYP2tYm5lHSfK7OYsJD1nMejYGPX3PvVld33cV00nPQY4lXpJOV8OHKjAMbhC
Z2Ppa5uG5YsvMgVGbNC7gs1/U3i3JydF2IBudjIQtGmU2LdLr0HbEVmrBmwq14dZ
n6Zq3v35BKuqio3HIwAPVCHWYwnMYwl5Y1op/PTx518tktVFOwAdLHyAubBddfP+
OgXFeQfmu2IhFtWERzbt+rCg4D03P5oo7/ATeS0foZKGsOS5YQa8cm77wN28uWY=
=DsW6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----