[TYPO3-doc] Do you miss a HAT

[Tim Wentzlau]

E. Veelo skrev:
> I think the T3 solution has been mentioned before but instead was opted 
> for the wiki, not sure for what reason.

When i wrote the my initial post i was thinking if a wiki solution is 
good enough. Wiki offers some of the functions that goes into a HAT but 
also miss important functionality.

First of all it is not very structured which makes it difficult to build 
documentation from submanuals. It misses version management, multi 
language support. And most important layout and format of wiki pages are 
plain ugly when it comes to produce good quality documentation.

> It makes a lot of sense to me to use T3, and it's like a proof of 
> concept that T3 is what it says it is.
Agree

> I think the only missing piece would be an extension to export to PDF or 
> DOC or other offline/printing media. If we can cramp the HAT with great 
> documents I'm sure someone will pick-up on that end.

I think that this process should separated in two first step is to make 
a XML export that could be turned into PDF and other formats for paper 
publishing.


Tim