[TYPO3-dam] dam_pages to the DAM team?

[Uschi Renziehausen]

++1 from me too

Uschi

Francois Suter schrieb:
> Hi,
> 
>> ++1
>> reasoning: usage of dam is only meaninful in conjunction with those 
>> extensions (at lease dam_ttcontent). IMHO all extensions that ARE 
>> needed in order to replace the classic fileadmin with DAM should go 
>> into the EXT dam (and their functions should being "activatable" via 
>> ext-config).
> 
> I fully agree with that. Actually we discussed something pretty similar 
> recently in the thread "Rewrite of dam_ttcontent" with the idea of 
> providing a simple way of adding DAM-relations fields to any table, like 
> is done by extensions such as "categories" or "tagpack".
> 
> Cheers
>