[TYPO3-content-rendering] XHTML strict?

[ben van 't ende [netcreators]]

Andreas Schwarzkopf wrote:
> Hi Kai,
> 
> Kai Laborenz schrieb:
> 
>> I am sorry if I ask something thats discussed before (in that case 
>> please just point me to this discussion), but is it a fixed decission 
>> to go for xhtml 1.0 strict output?
> 
> 
> it is the goal to make xhtml 1.0 strict possible, not to fix the output 
> to xhtml 1.0 strict generally. The goal is also to bound the many small 
> configurations to only one, e.g.:
> config.doctype = xhtml_strict
> 
> it can also be another one:
> 
> config.doctype = xhtml_trans
> 
>> It could make things more complicated than neccessary to skip 
>> transitional. I think a lot of people would miss things like "target"...
>>
>> As far as I know it makes no difference for accessibility and so I 
>> would like to offer both strict and transitional to choose from or 
>> just have transitional.
> 
> 
> of course it is not necessary, but it is a good thing to have a choice ;-)


Hi Guys,

I believe this is not fixed anywhere unless someone can point me to a spot where 
it says differently. As governmental agencies are going for strict I would say 
strict is the way to go. Any thoughts what might be the obstacles TYPO3 wise for 
achieving strict compared to transitional?

gRTz

ben
-- 
netcreators::creation and innovation
www.netcreators.nl -  www.typo3.nl