[TYPO3-commerce] com_defaultstock and com_ordernumber in TER

[Ingo Schmitt]

Hi Franz,

> Hi,
> 
>>> The ECT-style naming would be:
>>> ----------
>>> commerce__odernumber
>>> commerce__defaultstock
>>>
>>> fullParentExtensionName__addonDescription
>>> ----------
>>
>>
>> I personaly don't care for ECT in this case and like the chosen names!
> 
> 
> any relevant reason for that, besides of your personal taste?
> 
> I f.e. just wanted to install one of these extensions with the extension 
> manager a few minutes ago, and searched for 'commerce' in the hope to 
> get those extensions also listed - but that is not the case (which it 
> would with ECT-naming). Wouldn't you also expect to get those addons 
> listed? Well, I do.

If  there is a way to delete extensions from TER, I would do teh renaming.

> 
> Using ECT-style _suggested_ naming has nothing to do with beauty or our 
> personal flavors - it is just a matter of usability in the daily work 
> with TYPO3 (note that I wrote TYPO3 it in uppercase like suggested by 
> the 'offical' design guide of TYPO3, which is as official as ECT) and 
> the ECT is up to provide improvements for the TER based on that namings.
> 

> So why not thinking for the future? That's one big thing I really hate 
> in the TYPO3 'community' - "We have a framework that needs improvements, 
> so everybody for himself!".
> 

please calm down a bit ...

Ingo



> -- 
> Franz


Mit freundlichen Gruessen
-- 
Ingo Schmitt                        mailto:is at marketing-factory.de
Marketing Factory Consulting GmbH   http://typo3.marketing-factory.de/
Content Management mit Typo3: Beratung - Schulung - Realisierung