[Typo3] Extension rating

Ries van Twisk typo3 at rvt.dds.nl
Fri Aug 12 10:12:50 CEST 2005


Our new ltg_rating extention which is currently in development can 
handle that.

The new extention is for 95% finisched, can handle multiple types of 
ratings and can also rate other things then just pages.

I need to make the new documentation for it and upload it to TER though...

Ries



>Hello,
>
>  
>
>>I believe it would not. There are "popular" extensions, they will get
>>the highest rating. But there are much less used extensions, which are
>>extremely useful under some conditions.
>>    
>>
>
>If you take an average rating it doesn't matter whether 2 people voted
>or 2000. Also the less used extensions are usually for specific
>situations, so if you need something like that you'll probably search
>for it anyway.
>A rating system would be very handy for the more used extensions, since
>there often are multiple extensions that can basically do the same thing
>or seem to do the same thing from the. A rating system would mean you
>don't have to try them all to find the best one.
>
>  
>
>>"Most popular" section in TER would be interesting.
>>    
>>
>There already is a popular section on typo3.org, which list the most
>downloaded extensions.
>
>Met vriendelijke groet, 
>Rudy Gnodde
>
>WIND Internet
>Tijnjedyk 89
>8936 AC Leeuwarden
>Tel: 058 - 280 28 87
>Fax: 058 - 288 13 91
>E-mail: gnodde.rudy at wag.nl
>Internet: www.windinternet.nl 
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>De informatie verzonden met dit e-mailbericht (en bijlagen) is
>uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde(n) en zij die van de
>geadresseerde(n) toestemming hebben dit bericht te lezen. Gebruik door
>anderen dan geadresseerde(n) is verboden. De informatie in dit
>e-mailbericht (en de bijlagen) kan vertrouwelijk van aard zijn en kan
>binnen het bereik vallen van een geheimhoudingsplicht.
>WIND Internet is niet aansprakelijk voor schade ten gevolge van het
>gebruik van elektronische middelen van communicatie, daaronder begrepen
>-maar niet beperkt tot- schade ten gevolge van niet aflevering of
>vertraging bij de aflevering van elektronische berichten, onderschepping
>of manipulatie van elektronische berichten door derden of door
>programmatuur/apparatuur gebruikt voor elektronische communicatie en
>overbrenging van virussen en andere kwaadaardige programmatuur.
>
>Any information transmitted by means of this e-mail (and any of its
>attachments) is intended exclusively for the addressee or addressees and
>for those authorized by the addressee or addressees to read this
>message. Any use by a party other than the addressee or addressees is
>prohibited. The information contained in this e-mail (or any of its
>attachments) may be confidential in nature and fall under a duty of
>non-disclosure.
>WIND Internet shall not be liable for damages resulting from the use of
>electronic means of communication, including -but not limited to-
>damages resulting from failure or delay in delivery of electronic
>communications, interception or manipulation of electronic
>communications by third parties or by computer programs used for
>electronic communications and transmission of viruses and other
>malicious code.
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>  
>
>>-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
>>Van: typo3-english-bounces at lists.netfielders.de [mailto:typo3-english-
>>bounces at lists.netfielders.de] Namens Dmitry Dulepov
>>Verzonden: vrijdag 12 augustus 2005 12:33
>>Aan: typo3-english at lists.netfielders.de
>>Onderwerp: Re: [Typo3] Extension rating
>>
>>Hi!
>>
>>Carlos A. Chiari O. wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>Wouldn't it be a good idea to allow logged users to rate the
>>>      
>>>
>extension?
>  
>
>>I believe it would not. There are "popular" extensions, they will get
>>the highest rating. But there are much less used extensions, which are
>>extremely useful under some conditions.
>>
>>The idea of ratings is usually to define what people like more and
>>    
>>
>what
>  
>
>>they like less. How are people are going to "like" extension they
>>    
>>
>never
>  
>
>>used? Ratings is good for something equal like magazine articles, or
>>cakes, or cars. You would not rate truck car together with passenger
>>car, right? Or amateur Sesna aeroplan with Stealth jet flighter? They
>>are just not comparable. Same for extensions: each of them serves
>>different purpose. Not comparable...
>>
>>"Most popular" section in TER would be interesting. But rating makes
>>    
>>
>no
>  
>
>>sence at all in my opinion. Extensions are not pets, articles or post
>>stamps. They are modules used under
>>
>>Dmitry,
>>_______________________________________________
>>Typo3-english mailing list
>>Typo3-english at lists.netfielders.de
>>http://lists.netfielders.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/typo3-english
>>    
>>
>_______________________________________________
>Typo3-english mailing list
>Typo3-english at lists.netfielders.de
>http://lists.netfielders.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/typo3-english
>  
>


-- 
R. van Twisk
http://www.metamorf.net

Our Typo3 enabled website: http://www.livetravelguides.com
Instand help for Typo3?    irc:/irc.freenode.net/typo3
Looking for documentation? http://typo3.org/documentation/





More information about the TYPO3-english mailing list