[TYPO3-dev] Better use pibase while everyone use extbase?

Popy popy.dev at gmail.com
Mon Oct 6 11:04:08 CEST 2014


Hi,

2014-10-06 6:23 GMT+02:00 Georg Ringer <typo3 at ringerge.org>:
>
> of course nothing happens in pibase because there is nothing in it. All
> you get is an entry point to one class and a template engine which
> replaces some strange markers with content. this is really not much.
>
Not even an entry point : a simple class with a main function works aswell


> Because you don't want to code stuff like queries, argument mapping, and
> so on
>
You do know that you can use other libraries than Extbase ?


>
> > Additionally pibase is much faster as it isn't a full blown framework.
>
> A single php file is faster than this full blown CMS.
> A single html file is faster than PHP, so why do you even use PHP if you
> could use frontpage? you get the point?
>
Yet, it does not explain why it is wise to use a full blown Framework
poorly plugged into a full blown framework :)
The problem was that Typo3 didn't have good plugin tools before Extbase.
Extbase covers this now, but that does not makes Extbase perfect.

Regads,
Popy
<http://lists.typo3.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/typo3-dev>



More information about the TYPO3-dev mailing list