[TYPO3-dev] why USER "_INT" ?

Steffen Kamper info at sk-typo3.de
Tue Dec 1 11:04:06 CET 2009


Hi,

Martin Kutschker schrieb:
> 
> * I'm at loss now what excactly is stored in the cache for PHP_SCRIP_EXT. Must be some extra magic.

i think it's too late to change the suffix :)
NC would be the one all know (NoCache)

For PHP_SCRIPT i always only used the INT, so i never touched the logic. 
Does it make sense in your eyes to have 3 variants? I will have a look 
to code too, looking for being loss too :)

vg Steffen




More information about the TYPO3-dev mailing list