[TYPO3-dev] hide be_user options by default?

[Martin Kutschker]

Dmitry Dulepov [typo3] schrieb:
> 
> Do you see a problem with my proposed solution? I just outlined two 
> possibilities and said that one of them is better be avoided. But we are 
> free to use another to achieve the same effect and nothing will break;

You're right. Conditions are an option especially as the checkbox is 
semantically no type. SO I have no problem with it.

But I oppose a no-addying-of-types policy. This IMHO getting ridiculous. 
I'm really much for staying backwards compatible and all. But there has 
to be a line. And my is, we're free to add fields wheenever we feel like 
it. Kasper did even more by adding the whole versioning/WS stuff. That 
was a pretty big change in semantics. And was right to do it.

Masi