[TYPO3-dev] RFC as tool to concept branch 5.x

[Elmar Hinz]

Martin Schoenbeck wrote:
> 
> Maybe I missed something you wrote, but I don't know why you always have to
> add this personal attitude anytime somebody doesn't agree.
> 

Hello Martin,

you repeat the semi reflected theses of Michael that documentation is abuse
of TER. I have given good arguments, against this theses. Arguments that
should easyly be inlightning to a programmer.

1.) The relevant question of any repository is, how good and usefull the
displayed information is filtered. If the filters deliver the wanted
information, it is not of relevance how much information is stored in a
repository and for which different purposes.

2.) If you want to separate extensions and documentation it is possible to
set up independent repositories with the technology of TER.

3.) (TER has always been used to display documentation.)

People should take time to read and understand given arguments und to
answer to them. If they merely repeat the semi reflected theses from their
predecessors, their postings are not only a sign of disrespect. With this
behaviour they blow up a thread in an ugly way. They force to duplicate the
arguments, that already have been exchanged.

To make a theses is good. Every theses is only part of cognition. To repeat
a semi reflected theses without showing to reflect the counter-arguments
the posting becomes conter productive.

What is most disappointing for me is, how many posters show this pattern of
behaviour in this group. You only have been the one to many. I will not
answer to anyone in future, who completly ignores the arguments already
exchanged in a thread, instead of building on them in a constructive way.

Martin, again. You only showed this style of discussion in a subordinate
clause. You have got the bad luck to be the one to many to show this kind
of style.

Regards

Elmar