[TYPO3-dev] RFC as tool to concept branch 5.x

[Kasper Skårhøj]

I agree with Dan, lets get away from TER for the purpose of 5.0, please.

- kasper


On Jun 1, 2006, at 21:09 , dan frost wrote:

> Elmar.
>
> Fact: TER is not meant for discussion of ideas
>
> Fact: Making the TER a respository of RFCs will
> put non-TYPO3-functionality in it. This will annoy
> people. Imagine: download: "new TYPO3 versioning
> architecture" and you find it's a PDFs. How
> annoying is that.
>
> Fact: the TER is not "normal" for Open Source
> projects. They might have similar things, but they
> do not have the TER. For TYPO3 to grow, attract
> talent and become more of a standard  it must
> adopt straight-forward, easily understandable ways
> of doing things.
>
> The TER is the wrong tool for this.
>
> Now, let's get on with discussing the process of RFCs.
>
> dan
>
> Elmar Hinz wrote:
>> Christopher wrote:
>>>>> TER2 doesn't create any PDF at all.
>>>> That is a difficult point for now unless the feature is implemented
>>>> again.
>>> I could be wrong, but I don't think the _TER_ has ever done this. It
>>> has _contained_ pdfs of some documents, but I don't think it created
>>> them...
>>>
>>> -Christopher
>>
>> Well, they "occured" after some days in TER1. Maybe someone has  
>> generated
>> them by hand.
>>
>> Openoffice is opensource. I guess the engine to transform .sxw  
>> to .pdf
>> could have been extracted from the editor.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Elmar
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> TYPO3-dev mailing list
> TYPO3-dev at lists.netfielders.de
> http://lists.netfielders.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/typo3-dev


- kasper

"A contribution a day keeps the fork away"
-------------------------------
kasper2006 at typo3.com | +45 20 999 115 | skype: kasperskaarhoej |  
gizmo: kasper_typo3