[Typo3-dev] Validating TypoScript - Schema vs. DTD
Mathias Schreiber [wmdb]
mathias.schreiber at wmdb.de
Wed Nov 30 09:08:54 CET 2005
Mark Ravitz wrote:
> As an occasional user of TYPO3, having built two commercial TYPO3 web
> sites, I strongly disagree.
A "why" would have been nice.
>> It just takes some time of experience. And depends on how the code is
>> developed ;-)
>
>
> I don't have time :-(
"Hey Mr. Pilot, I need to know how to fly this 747, you have 3 hours -
i'm a busy man".
> Debugging TS involves more than getting the syntax right, you must
> figure out if you are using the right TS strategy, and then you have
> to decode the TSRef documentation.
Sounds a bit like "blindflug development" to me. No offense.
> Validating TS would be great, but my problems with TS would be solved if
> the TSRef was improved. It's written in such a terse, abbreviated style
> that I spend most of my TS development time trying understand the TS objects.
> It would be better if the TSRef format was changed so that there was space
> for more verbose explanations of properties and options, and if there were
> 'copy and paste' examples of everything.
Yeah.
Very good approach.
"I don't want to understand what's happening, I just want to copy and
paste."
Maybe I should develop an extension that works like this:
Login to the TYPO3 BE.
Clap your hands twice.
Website ready.
> TS syntax may be unusual, but it's clearly documented. The TS objects are
> not clearly documented.
Is that so?
Examples please.
> I wish the whole TSRef was moved to the wiki, sort of like the PHP on line
> manual
To have what? comments?
Look again...
peace
Mattes
--
if ($GLOBALS['TSFE']->fe_user->user['ahnung'] == 0) {
$this->fresseHalten = 1;
}
More information about the TYPO3-dev
mailing list