[Typo3-debian] Some questions about unstable install
Michael Stucki
mundaun at gmx.ch
Thu Nov 20 01:16:14 CET 2003
Hi Lars, Steffen!
> > Why is a backport better?
> backports are design to fit into distribution dependencies.
> mixed distributions could crash your dependencies or ask you to install
> the whole bunch of new versions you never have been aware that they
> exist anyway :)
To make it more clear: Just think about binary compatibility! Woody was based
on libc6 2.2.5 while Sid currently uses 2.3.2.
> > Should I install a backport for php4, and one for apache etc.?
> if your doing this for testing anyway, why not upgrade the whole machine
> to testing/unstable distribution?
> if you're not dependend on an "just-running-and-easy-to-manage" system,
> this could be your solution.
I just wonder why you want to update your system at all?! TYPO3 runs great
with Woody. No backports needed - just Woody!
I don't see any gains of this experiment.
> remember:
> at the moment, debian security fixes are limited to woody.
> upgrading testing/unstable packages could break your system.
If you are working on a production server, you simply must use the current
stable release (Woody)!
Kind regards
- michael
More information about the TYPO3-debian
mailing list